Stealing from thieves aint stealing PDF Print E-mail

Favoured : 24

*sound of crickets chirping*


h/t and h/t


Before the campaign even began, a controversial web site was created:

http://www.sameoldsaskparty.ca


Yesterday, the Sask Party retaliated with http://www.calvertdelivers.com


We may as well tell you right now, this is going to get GEEKY. Please find the nearest nerd and keep him close, you may need one. Click the image to be shown a larger size image in a separate window (for added detail).


Take a good close look at the Same Old Sask Party web site.



the Same Old Sask Party web site advises you to to keep a sharp eye out for that nasty wolf in sheep's clothing. Look real close, just like Lorne wants you to look at the Sask Party. See anything?


No?

Let's keep looking.


In the image below, we come to the 'money shot' statement, 'Say NO to the Sask Party Hidden agenda.



Seen any wolves in sheep's clothing yet?


Well, they are hiding in places you would never expect them to be, and in places only a few people would know where to look.


You might want to grab your geek now.


In Internet Explorer, go to 'View', then 'Source'. In Firefox press 'CTRL'+'U'. You will see a bunch of what Geeks call 'Code'. In this code, there is not only ONE, but TWO wolves in Sheep's clothing.


We found that the Same Old Sask Party web site runs on a content management system called CMSimple from http://www.cmsimple.dk


We also found that the template 'Greenshades' was used in the building of this web site.


We did some research and found what 'Greenshades' looked like before it became all dipped up in Sheep and Wolves. We found a screen shot below:



'Greenshades came from a web site called DotcomWebDesign.com. We visited this web site and found the following license terms:


'Template copyright violation

License terms for the template are here: http://www.dotcomwebdesign.com/?Purchase-A-Licence

1. General Use - FREE
Download and use our website templates for free of any costs, however you must not remove the links to CMSimple.dk & DotcomWebDesign.com.

We offer these templates as instant downloads in good faith and trust that you will not remove our links without purchasing the licenses in the options below.

WARNING: Removing the "powered by cmsimple" and or "dotcomwebdesign" - links without purchasing the required licences, is a violation of the licence. This also applies testing purposes.

Violating the licence may result in a complaint without any prior warning to the internet service providers hosting the illegal use of this software.

Violating the licence may result in a claim for compensation not less than $US 200- for a commercial licence and claims handling.

Please be aware that all cmsimple installations are monitored via cmsimple.dk


So, we went back to www.sameoldsaskparty.ca and we read all the source code for the page, and we found this "href="" _fcksavedurl="">" _fcksavedurl="">" _fcksavedurl="">" _fcksavedurl="">" _fcksavedurl="">" _fcksavedurl="">" _fcksavedurl="">" _fcksavedurl="">" target="_blank" title="Design By Dotcomwebdesign.com" alt="Design By Dotcomwebdesign.com"" ....

...and there is a hidden link in the web site where illustrated in the picture above. Go to www.sameoldsaskparty.ca and try to find it yourself. If you find one, you may find...

This was rather curious, so we visited the Content Management Web Site and found licensing terms there.

'CMSimple is free to use, but only if a link to cmsimple.dk is kept visible in the template for the site. If you want to remove or hide the link to cmsimple.dk from your pages, you must purchase a commercial licence for the site.'

Peter even states in his License FAQ : 'You may not change or delete the copyright notice in the comment of the files, but please add the information, that the site is licensed by you or your company.'

No such statement exists in the www.sameoldsaskparty.ca source code.

We did find this statement: href="http://www.cmsimple.dk" target="_blank" title="Powered By CMSimple.dk" alt="Powered By CMSimple.dk"

and when we visit the page, we find a hidden hyper link (see image below).


We find TWO hidden live links on the SameOldSaskParty web site, BOTH of which violate the license agreement of the template and software developer.

Have we found a wolf or two in sheep's clothing?

Let's CHECK!

The software developer has an online license check on his web site here.

We type in the domain name SameOldSaskParty.ca........

and we receive a result .......


We emailed the developer of the template over in Australia to see if he had a record of a paid license for http://www.sameoldsaskparty.ca and we received the following answer...




Oh, it seems that the sameoldsaskparty web site might have a licensing issue! Soon after, we receive another follow up email from the template developer stating:


I guess either someone will be producing a receipt, or making those live links visible to conform to the licensing agreement. We will keep you updated as the story develops.


UPDATE: As of 12:30 am C.S.T., the SameOldSaskParty web site has been updated. Suddenly, credit where credit due is NOW being given.


Rather raise the questions:

1) Why have the NDP knowingly been using unlicensed software and design for months?
2) Will Lorne Calvert publicly acknowledge and apologize for using unlicensed software?






   
Quote this article in website
Favoured
Print
Send to friend
Related articles
Save this to del.icio.us

Keywords : sameoldsaskparty, calvertdelivers, dotcomwebdeisgn, dotcomwebdesign, sameoldsaskparty, 'greenshades', controversial, installations, 'greenshades, compensation, unlicensed, software,


Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Average user rating

   (0 vote)

 

Display 2 of 2 comments

Confused

By: Giant Political Mouse (Guest) on 29-10-2007 08:12

Confused

By: Giant Political Mouse (Guest IP 204.83.230.225) on 29-10-2007 08:12

Thanks for the hat tip, but I am a little confused. You say that the licencing says, "however you must not remove the links to CMSimple.dk & DotcomWebDesign.com." 
But the links were not removed,were they? I mean, you point to the fact that the links were working, you click on them to prove the whole crux of your argument.  
Perhaps the link is now more visible, which is a good thing, but the link was always there, and thus the terms of the license were always complied with.  
Note the use of the term "more" visible as again, with the mouseovers left intact, the link was always "visible"

 

» Report this comment to administrator

» Reply to this comment...

» See all 1 replie(s)

Kelsey

By: Trent (Guest) on 24-06-2008 07:16

Kelsey

By: Trent (Guest IP 189.19.3.21) on 24-06-2008 07:16

2bda85b24cd25f642acbf413ddc671 f0  
http://njdokj.info/ 39b9e1017cc64b1b68b4ad8150c2e1 ca/ 2bda85b24cd25f642acbf413ddc671 f0  
http://njdokj.info/ 39b9e1017cc64b1b68b4ad8150c2e1 ca/ 2bda85b24cd25f642acbf413ddc671 f0  
[url]http://njdokj.info/ 39b9e1017cc64b1b68b4ad8150c2e1 ca/ 2bda85b24cd25f642acbf413ddc671 f0[url]

 

» Report this comment to administrator

» Reply to this comment...

Display 2 of 2 comments



Add your comment
Name
Title  
 
Comment
 
Available characters: 600
 
   
   



mXcomment 1.0.5 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
Sunday, 28 October 2007
 
< Prev   Next >

Tags

actual agenda alberta alternet appear archives asses babble babbler based behavior believe best better bought brad bucks called calvert calvertdelivers campaign canada candidate candidates care carry cash change cheap check child children choice choices city claims click close clothing cmsimple code come coming comment comments commercial common community company compensation complete conservative content control copy copyright corporations costs country couple current debate decided decision democratic design developer didn document does doing dotcomwebdesign download dropped drugs economy elected election electronics email engaged environmental event excellent fact famouspipeliner fcksavedurl fight folks follow following free freedom friend funny getting given going good google government grain great green greenshades guide hand handling happy hard hasn health hear hidden high hours house html http human illegal image included information interesting internet issue jeff just kids know leader leadership left licence license licensing life like lines link links little live lives logged long look lorne make makes making management means member members membership money mosimage national nature need news note notice number october office online open opinion order page paid parties party past paying people person personally peter pill place plan plans play point points political poor posted potts power powered private process profile program promises prove province public purchase question questions quot rabble race rate rated rating read readers reality really recycle registered remain remove rest result right roads rouser rowing running said sameoldsaskparty sask saskatchewan save saying says school second seek sgeu sheep shit shot site smalldeadanimals social software soon sorry source speak spending split stand statement steering stepped stick story sure suspect swift taking taxes taxpayer team tell telling template templates terms terrible thing things think thread time today tommy tomorrow true truth ultimatebb understand union unions unlicensed update used using view visible vote voters waiting wall want website went whining wolf wolves woman words work working world worse wouldn writ wrong yeah year years 2005 2006 2007 9177

social bookmarking

StatsWatch

JoomlaWatch Stats 1.2.0

Ads

Copyright © 2006 No Democratic Process